last night we heard katha pollitt speak in clinton. the hamilton college english department brought her to talk about the process of writing memoirs, as she is currently working on her own. she read two sections from this work: one about her experiences in a marxist study group in greenwich village, and another about her time working as an editor for a publishing house that churned out pornographic books. both were funny, provocative and sharp reavealing pollitt's gift for effortlessly weaving the personal and the political in her prose.
i have long read katha pollitt's writings in the nation and elsewhere. i haven't always agreed with her observations on politics and culture, but more often than not, i do share her progressive stance on most issues. i'm thankful that she is out there writing, saying things that most journalists and media "pundits" can't or don't say in today's conservative climate. as she said in so many words last night, there are virtually no leftist voices in politics and culture today. she pointed out that paul krugman (the former clinton admirer who writes for the new york times) is considered a left-leaning liberal when, at best, his politics are truly moderate. as we were leaving her lecture we tried to think of current, progressive voices in the media, and could only come up with Pollitt, even though i know there must be 2 or 3 more :)
i found her advice about the craft and process of writing to be beneficial. she writes 1000 word essays for the nation every two weeks, and described her imposed writing deadline as "liberating." she also stressed the importance of form and shape to all writing pieces regardless of intent or size. during the q and a, i wanted to ask about her own revision process, and if she had complete freedom to write about whatever topic she chose in the nation. but, i was too damn nervous. i have never been able to ask speakers questions during the q and a even though i always have a strong desire to do so.
one last thing that struck me about pollitt is that she appeared so shy, barely able to make eye contact with her audience. she answered questions graciously during the q and a, and there wasn't an ounce of ego to her demeanor or anything she said. but, i was struck by her shyness in front of an audience. perhaps she doesn't address audiences regularly and spends most of her time behind a keyboard in the solitary space of her office spinning out those incisive, thoughtful writings on economics, politics and culture that so many of us enjoy and admire.
jb
